@northstoryCA @larrykim Resumes are an absolutely horrid way to screen candidates – whether via ATS or human review 99% of the time, it’s having a contact that gets you in front of the hiring manager and interview team It’s [almost] never *the resume*

Resumes are an absolutely horrid way to screen candidates – whether via ATS or human review 99% of the time, it's having a contact that gets you in front of the hiring manager and interview team It's [almost] never *the resume* — Warren Myers ?? (@warrenmyers) August 9, 2019 from Twitter https://twitter.com/warrenmyers August 09, 2019 …
Continue reading @northstoryCA @larrykim Resumes are an absolutely horrid way to screen candidates – whether via ATS or human review 99% of the time, it’s having a contact that gets you in front of the hiring manager and interview team It’s [almost] never *the resume*

@larrykim This is barely better than trash – formatting problems, poor fonts, badly ordered, no space for notes, too wordy… Be consistent Be concise Get others to check it for errors

This is barely better than trash – formatting problems, poor fonts, badly ordered, no space for notes, too wordy… Be consistentBe concise Get others to check it for errors — Warren Myers ?? (@warrenmyers) August 9, 2019 from Twitter https://twitter.com/warrenmyers August 09, 2019 at 05:52AM via IFTTT

@mileslaw2 @salokinsekwah1 @simongerman600 Then ignore them :) But back to your fallacious claims of unsustainable food production – not only can we out-produce what we need *now* (sustainably), & have been able to for half a century, we’ll can for double the current global population

Then ignore them 🙂 But back to your fallacious claims of unsustainable food production – not only can we out-produce what we need *now* (sustainably), & have been able to for half a century, we’ll can for double the current global population — Warren Myers ?? (@warrenmyers) August 9, 2019 from Twitter https://twitter.com/warrenmyers August 09, …
Continue reading @mileslaw2 @salokinsekwah1 @simongerman600 Then ignore them 🙂 But back to your fallacious claims of unsustainable food production – not only can we out-produce what we need *now* (sustainably), & have been able to for half a century, we’ll can for double the current global population

@subschneider @EnzoDiependaal Back in the 80s some time, there was a @NatGeoMag article (iirc) about storing nuclear waste in abandoned salt mines in Germany And how as the mines collapsed on the waste, it was [effectively] neutralized

Back in the 80s some time, there was a @NatGeoMag article (iirc) about storing nuclear waste in abandoned salt mines in Germany And how as the mines collapsed on the waste, it was [effectively] neutralized — Warren Myers ?? (@warrenmyers) August 9, 2019 from Twitter https://twitter.com/warrenmyers August 08, 2019 at 09:05PM via IFTTT

@EnzoDiependaal @subschneider Always thought the Yucca Mountain scheme to store nuclear waste was short-sighted:: there’s always a use for ”spent” fuel (like newer reactors that consume ”nuclear waste” for fuel)

Always thought the Yucca Mountain scheme to store nuclear waste was short-sighted:: there's always a use for ”spent” fuel (like newer reactors that consume ”nuclear waste” for fuel) — Warren Myers ?? (@warrenmyers) August 9, 2019 from Twitter https://twitter.com/warrenmyers August 08, 2019 at 09:00PM via IFTTT

@simongerman600 This is why ”overpopulation” can never really happen: affluent nations self-limit their growth As affluence spreads, growth slows, stabilizes, and may even turn negative

This is why ”overpopulation” can never really happen: affluent nations self-limit their growth As affluence spreads, growth slows, stabilizes, and may even turn negative — Warren Myers ?? (@warrenmyers) August 9, 2019 from Twitter https://twitter.com/warrenmyers August 08, 2019 at 08:54PM via IFTTT

@subschneider @AndrewYang @JoshuaLisec Which leads to a related question: if the *government* can exchange cash for not voting, why shouldn’t the *private sector* be able to do the corollary – cash to vote a particular way?

Which leads to a related question: if the *government* can exchange cash for not voting, why shouldn't the *private sector* be able to do the corollary – cash to vote a particular way? — Warren Myers ?? (@warrenmyers) August 9, 2019 from Twitter https://twitter.com/warrenmyers August 08, 2019 at 08:52PM via IFTTT

@subschneider @AndrewYang @JoshuaLisec ….and what a way to subsidize college, right? $12-36k per year to not vote? College students *already* don’t vote – now they could do it in a paid manner

….and what a way to subsidize college, right? $12-36k per year to not vote? College students *already* don't vote – now they could do it in a paid manner — Warren Myers ?? (@warrenmyers) August 9, 2019 from Twitter https://twitter.com/warrenmyers August 08, 2019 at 08:51PM via IFTTT

@subschneider @AndrewYang @JoshuaLisec This could be a fascinating experiment for single-income families: the spouse who ”doesn’t work” could take the cash-for-voting exchange, effectively reclaiming the taxes paid by the ”working” spouse My wife would take it in a heartbeat, I suspect :)

This could be a fascinating experiment for single-income families: the spouse who ”doesn't work” could take the cash-for-voting exchange, effectively reclaiming the taxes paid by the ”working” spouse My wife would take it in a heartbeat, I suspect 🙂 — Warren Myers ?? (@warrenmyers) August 9, 2019 from Twitter https://twitter.com/warrenmyers August 08, 2019 at 08:49PM …
Continue reading @subschneider @AndrewYang @JoshuaLisec This could be a fascinating experiment for single-income families: the spouse who ”doesn’t work” could take the cash-for-voting exchange, effectively reclaiming the taxes paid by the ”working” spouse My wife would take it in a heartbeat, I suspect 🙂