RT @G_S_Bhogal: 23. Extended Cognition: Our eyes are no longer our eyes. They’ve been reduced to optic nerves relaying what’s seen by our new sense organs: phones & computers. We now see much more, but by extending our nervous systems outside ourselves, we’ve exposed them to a vulturous world.

RT @G_S_Bhogal: 23. Extended Cognition: Our eyes are no longer our eyes. They’ve been reduced to optic nerves relaying what’s seen by our new sense organs: phones & computers. We now see much more, but by extending our nervous systems outside ourselves, we’ve exposed them to a vulturous world. — Warren Myers ๐Ÿง๐Ÿฟ (@warrenmyers) Mar …
Continue reading RT @G_S_Bhogal: 23. Extended Cognition: Our eyes are no longer our eyes. They’ve been reduced to optic nerves relaying what’s seen by our new sense organs: phones & computers. We now see much more, but by extending our nervous systems outside ourselves, we’ve exposed them to a vulturous world.

RT @G_S_Bhogal: 20. Hyperbolic Discounting: Just as objects far away seem smaller, so do things far into our future. As a result, we are inclined to choose immediate rewards over future ones, even when these immediate rewards are much smaller. To overcome this bias, use @navalโ€™s Compass: https://t.co/crBqdaX5au

RT @G_S_Bhogal: 20. Hyperbolic Discounting: Just as objects far away seem smaller, so do things far into our future. As a result, we are inclined to choose immediate rewards over future ones, even when these immediate rewards are much smaller. To overcome this bias, use @navalโ€™s Compass: https://t.co/crBqdaX5au — Warren Myers ๐Ÿง๐Ÿฟ (@warrenmyers) Mar 11, …
Continue reading RT @G_S_Bhogal: 20. Hyperbolic Discounting: Just as objects far away seem smaller, so do things far into our future. As a result, we are inclined to choose immediate rewards over future ones, even when these immediate rewards are much smaller. To overcome this bias, use @navalโ€™s Compass: https://t.co/crBqdaX5au

RT @G_S_Bhogal: 19. Problem Selling: Problem-solvers take an issue and break it down into small solvable chunks. Problem-sellers (e.g. politicians, the press) do the opposite: bundling many small issues into one big problem that looks insurmountable and terrifying. h/t: @BoyanSlat

RT @G_S_Bhogal: 19. Problem Selling: Problem-solvers take an issue and break it down into small solvable chunks. Problem-sellers (e.g. politicians, the press) do the opposite: bundling many small issues into one big problem that looks insurmountable and terrifying. h/t: @BoyanSlat — Warren Myers ๐Ÿง๐Ÿฟ (@warrenmyers) Mar 11, 2022 from Twitter https://twitter.com/warrenmyers March 11, 2022 at …
Continue reading RT @G_S_Bhogal: 19. Problem Selling: Problem-solvers take an issue and break it down into small solvable chunks. Problem-sellers (e.g. politicians, the press) do the opposite: bundling many small issues into one big problem that looks insurmountable and terrifying. h/t: @BoyanSlat

RT @G_S_Bhogal: 12. Fredkin’s Paradox: The more similar two choices seem, the less the decision should matter, yet the harder it is to choose between them. As a result, we often spend the most time on the decisions that matter least.

RT @G_S_Bhogal: 12. Fredkin’s Paradox: The more similar two choices seem, the less the decision should matter, yet the harder it is to choose between them. As a result, we often spend the most time on the decisions that matter least. — Warren Myers ๐Ÿง๐Ÿฟ (@warrenmyers) Mar 11, 2022 from Twitter https://twitter.com/warrenmyers March 11, 2022 …
Continue reading RT @G_S_Bhogal: 12. Fredkin’s Paradox: The more similar two choices seem, the less the decision should matter, yet the harder it is to choose between them. As a result, we often spend the most time on the decisions that matter least.

RT @G_S_Bhogal: 2. Twyman’s Law: The more notable the data, the more likely it’s wrong. This is because errors and data manipulation are far more common than genuine notable (i.e. surprising) results. Conversely, the more boring the data, the more trustworthy.

RT @G_S_Bhogal: 2. Twyman’s Law: The more notable the data, the more likely it’s wrong. This is because errors and data manipulation are far more common than genuine notable (i.e. surprising) results. Conversely, the more boring the data, the more trustworthy. — Warren Myers ๐Ÿง๐Ÿฟ (@warrenmyers) Mar 11, 2022 from Twitter https://twitter.com/warrenmyers March 11, 2022 …
Continue reading RT @G_S_Bhogal: 2. Twyman’s Law: The more notable the data, the more likely it’s wrong. This is because errors and data manipulation are far more common than genuine notable (i.e. surprising) results. Conversely, the more boring the data, the more trustworthy.

Favorite tweets

TikTok canโ€™t come up with an actual reason for removing my viral video, so theyโ€™re literally just insulting my integrity. https://t.co/bZQVEwlJcL — Michael Knowles (@michaeljknowles) Mar 11, 2022 from http://twitter.com/michaeljknowles via IFTTT

Hey @agoX … this one was just mean! ๐ŸŒŽ Mar 11, 2022 ๐ŸŒ Today’s guesses: 15 Current streak: 2 Average guesses: 11 https://t.co/hIZ8Df5K3o

Hey @agoX … this one was just mean! ๐ŸŒŽ Mar 11, 2022 ๐ŸŒ Today’s guesses: 15 Current streak: 2 Average guesses: 11 https://t.co/hIZ8Df5K3o — Warren Myers ๐Ÿง๐Ÿฟ (@warrenmyers) Mar 11, 2022 from Twitter https://twitter.com/warrenmyers March 11, 2022 at 11:55AM via IFTTT

Favorite tweets

@D_B_Harrison Judging by some of the trollish responses, you must have hit the target. — DCole (@darylcoleman) Mar 10, 2022 from http://twitter.com/darylcoleman via IFTTT

@D_B_Harrison 50y ago it was global cooling Then the hole in the ozone layer Then global warming Now the ever-nebulous “climate change” Crichton summed it so well in “State of Fear”

@D_B_Harrison 50y ago it was global cooling Then the hole in the ozone layer Then global warming Now the ever-nebulous “climate change” Crichton summed it so well in “State of Fear” — Warren Myers ๐Ÿง๐Ÿฟ (@warrenmyers) Mar 11, 2022 from Twitter https://twitter.com/warrenmyers March 11, 2022 at 08:04AM via IFTTT

Favorite tweets

I want a Batman villain called The Jostler who just comes up to people and gives ’em a little shake for no reason, terrorizing the good people of Gotham. — Technology Connections (@TechConnectify) Mar 11, 2022 from http://twitter.com/TechConnectify via IFTTT

Favorite tweets

@jollycyanide @smack_q @warrenmyers @JosephRReagan @nypost To recap she was 22 when she sent that 7 year message and grooming is used to assault childern not adults — Jon (@braindead809) Mar 11, 2022 from http://twitter.com/braindead809 via IFTTT

Favorite tweets

@jollycyanide @smack_q @warrenmyers @JosephRReagan @nypost By the info I gave?? I just read the article when those messages were sent is all we don’t know exactly when they met or who started this all I know is they started a relationship after she was 18 — Jon (@braindead809) Mar 11, 2022 from http://twitter.com/braindead809 via IFTTT

Favorite tweets

@jollycyanide @smack_q @warrenmyers @JosephRReagan @nypost Like I said that message was sent in 2015 and she was 18 in 2011 I’m sure u can do math — Jon (@braindead809) Mar 11, 2022 from http://twitter.com/braindead809 via IFTTT

Favorite tweets

@jollycyanide @smack_q @warrenmyers @JosephRReagan @nypost Wait so grooming is you know someone and wait till they are an adult to have a relationship or sex and like I said we don’t know how this started wat if she pursed him and only after she graduated this is clearly just opposition research by her opponent — …
Continue reading Favorite tweets

Favorite tweets

@BoolinBilo @smack_q @warrenmyers @JosephRReagan @nypost Isnt Grooming is used to assault childern it’s not grooming to know someone and then have sex with them as an adult is it? — Jon (@braindead809) Mar 11, 2022 from http://twitter.com/braindead809 via IFTTT

Favorite tweets

So thankful Jussie Smollettโ€™s attacker was sent to jail today. ๐Ÿ™๐Ÿป — Liz Wheeler (@Liz_Wheeler) Mar 11, 2022 from http://twitter.com/Liz_Wheeler via IFTTT

Favorite tweets

@smack_q @warrenmyers @JosephRReagan @nypost Well idk about that but neither do you all we know is that this happened after highschool and when she was 18 — Jon (@braindead809) Mar 10, 2022 from http://twitter.com/braindead809 via IFTTT